The Bombay High Court has recently upheld the closure order of a stone crusher, noting that the Mumbai Trans Harbour Sea Link, also known as Atal Setu, is a …
Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S Om Stone Crusher v. State & Ors. on CaseMine.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Ceeyen Stone Crusher v. State Of Kerala on CaseMine.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Shree Channabasaveshwara Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine.
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel for the parties submit that in some of these matters pleadings are not yet complete.
Full text of the Supreme Court Judgment: Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India & Ors | Judgments dated August, 1991. ... He will also enquire from the mine lessees and owners of stone crushers as also from the thekedars and jamadars whether there are any advances made by them to the labourers working in the stone …
The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of A.P. 4386. This case relates to the petitioner herein himself.
1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the stone crushers shall not …
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and found the transit fee under Rule 5 to be regulatory, stating that it was not necessary for the State to establish quid pro quo.
Get free access to the complete judgment in State Of Uttaranchal Petitioner(S) v. Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). on CaseMine.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7230 OF 2012 Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr. …Appellant(s) vs ... judgment and Order dated 08.01.2009, passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, at Shimla in CWP No. 1362 of 2001. 2.
Get Solution & Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *
This page is about stone crusher supreme court judgement, click here to get more infomation about stone crusher supreme court judgement.
Supreme Court of India State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 September, 2017 ... The High Court in its judgment has noticed details of few of the writ petitions facts of only leading petition which need to be briefly referred: ... the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such 59 crushing of the stone. High Court of ...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.1627-1628 of 2022 ... were the lease holders of these stone quarries, filed an application for impleadment which was rejected by the ... crushing, screening, stockpiling and transporting of aggregate were also recognised in the plan. It was mentioned that
Also Read: Supreme Court Judgment on Suretech Hospital Medical Negligence Case: A Tale of Negligence and Unnecessary Risk-Taking Decision Respondent no. 4 and 4A are directed to submit an undertaking to shift their stone crushing units outside the residential area by 30th November, 2018.
ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing units in and around New Delhi.
Get free access to the complete judgment in State Of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Kumaon Stone Crusher on CaseMine.
i. Hazara Stone Crusher. ii. AnsarMajeed Khan Stone Crusher. iii. Gujjar Stone Crusher. He has also stated that pursuant to the judgment of august Supreme Court of Pakistan operations of the said crushermachines were stopped. Similarly, the Environment Department of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Respondents no. 7 & 8,
Order. 1. Mr M.C Mehta — environmentalist lawyer — has filed this public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Haryana Pollution Control Board (the Board) to control the pollution caused by the stone crushers, pulverisers and mine operators in the Faridabad-Balabgarh area.
The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the Revenue. Accordingly, all the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the …
The stone crusher sector is responsible for significant fugitive dust emissions and causes severe air pollution. The Environment Pollution (Prevention & Control) Authority (EPCA) banned the operation of the stone crusher units, along with brick kilns and hot mix plants, under the implementation of the Graded Response Action Plan …
In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana1, the SEIAA clearance is necessary before stone mining is permitted. Further, there has to be valid lease for the purpose. Stone crushing has to be as per requisite safeguards against pollution.
Kashmir Stone Crushers/Hot and Wet Mixing Plants Regulation Rules, 2021, have been promulgated. 2. ... has been explained by the Supreme Court in numerous judgments. handed down by the Supreme Court from time to time. Mohinder. Singh Gill v. Election Commission of India, (1978) 1 SCC 405,
In an appeal by Ministry of Environment, the Supreme Court has called for a report from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) on the issue of pollution by Stone Crushing Units and as to ...
The grievance of the appellant is about the directions issued in the paragraph 15 of the impugned judgment. This direction is against 343 identified stone crusher units, as mentioned in the report of the Joint Committee dated 17 th January, 2023.
Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Himalaya Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Uttarakhand on CaseMine.
On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of levy of transit ...
The petitioner is the owner of the Stone Crusher known as Ashok Stone Crusher, Chorpani, Ramnagar Nainital. The petitioner is carrying on the business of manufacturing of stone grits, stone chips and sand etc.
the Appellants is that their stone quarries are not amongst the 11 quarries which are said to have ingressed into the eco-sensitive zone. They contended that their stone quarries …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Maa Vindhya Stone Crushing Company And Another Petitioner v. State Of U.P. And Others on CaseMine.
M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher _____ Respondent. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004, decided on February 10, 2016
The Bombay High Court on Monday upheld the orders of the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) of Panvel mandating the closure of stone-crushing plants operating near …
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be made on the finished items of stone i.e. …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on CaseMine.
حقوق النشر والنسخ؛ 2024.Aava جميع الحقوق محفوظة.خريطة الموقع